Why Dhruv Rathee Viral Video on Modi Dictatorship?

Analyzing Dhruv Rathee’s Viral Video on Modi’s Dictatorship


In recent years, social media has become a powerful platform for individuals to express their opinions and share information. One such individual is Dhruv Rathee, a popular Indian YouTuber and social media influencer known for his critical analysis of political events. In one of his viral videos, Rathee discusses the concept of “Modi Dictatorship” and its implications for Indian democracy. This article aims to analyze the key arguments presented in Rathee’s video, providing a balanced perspective on the topic.

Understanding the Context:

To comprehend Rathee’s claims, it is essential to understand the political landscape in India during the tenure of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Modi, a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has been in power since 2014. His leadership has been marked by significant policy changes and controversial decisions, which have sparked both praise and criticism.

Key Arguments Presented by Rathee:

1. Concentration of Power:
Rathee argues that Modi’s leadership style exhibits characteristics of a dictatorship due to the centralization of power within the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO). He highlights the Prime Minister’s control over key decision-making processes, bypassing traditional channels of governance. Rathee suggests that this concentration of power undermines the principles of checks and balances, essential for a healthy democracy.

2. Suppression of Dissent:
Another point raised by Rathee is the alleged suppression of dissenting voices under Modi’s regime. He claims that the government has targeted journalists, activists, and opposition leaders who criticize or question its policies. Rathee argues that this stifling of dissent is indicative of an authoritarian regime, where freedom of speech and expression are curtailed.

3. Media Manipulation:
Rathee asserts that the Modi government has effectively manipulated the media to control the narrative and shape public opinion. He argues that certain media outlets have become mouthpieces for the ruling party, disseminating biased information and suppressing alternative viewpoints. Rathee suggests that this manipulation further strengthens the perception of a dictatorial regime.

4. Erosion of Institutions:
Rathee contends that the Modi government has weakened key democratic institutions, such as the judiciary and the Election Commission. He cites instances where the government allegedly interfered in judicial appointments and influenced electoral processes, undermining the independence and credibility of these institutions. Rathee argues that this erosion of institutional integrity is a hallmark of a dictatorship.

5. Polarization and Divisive Politics:
Lastly, Rathee highlights the divisive nature of Modi’s politics, emphasizing the rise of religious polarization and communal tensions during his tenure. He argues that the government’s focus on majoritarian policies and rhetoric has deepened societal divisions, threatening the secular fabric of the nation. Rathee suggests that this divisive approach is characteristic of dictatorial regimes, which exploit societal fault lines for political gain.

Critical Analysis:

While Rathee’s video presents several valid concerns, it is crucial to critically evaluate the arguments put forth. It is important to note that political discourse often involves differing perspectives, and the reality may lie somewhere between extremes.

Firstly, the concentration of power within the PMO is not unique to the Modi government. Previous administrations in India have also faced criticism for centralizing decision-making processes. However, it is essential to ensure that checks and balances are in place to prevent any abuse of power.

Secondly, while instances of suppression of dissent have been reported, it is important to acknowledge that criticism and opposition are still prevalent in India. The existence of a vibrant civil society, independent media outlets, and active opposition parties indicates that dissent is not entirely stifled.

Thirdly, media manipulation is a concern in any democracy, and it is crucial to promote media literacy and support independent journalism to counter biased narratives. However, it is essential to recognize that media outlets have diverse ownership and editorial policies, and not all can be painted with the same brush.

Fourthly, the erosion of institutions is a serious concern, and any interference in their functioning should be addressed. However, it is important to differentiate between isolated incidents and systemic erosion, as well as to acknowledge the role of other political actors in influencing these institutions.

Lastly, while polarization and divisive politics are concerning, it is essential to recognize that societal divisions predate the current government. Addressing these issues requires collective efforts from all stakeholders, including political parties, civil society, and citizens.


Dhruv Rathee’s viral video on Modi’s dictatorship raises important questions about the state of democracy in India. While his arguments highlight genuine concerns, it is crucial to critically analyze the claims and consider multiple perspectives. Democracy thrives on open dialogue and the ability to question those in power. By engaging in constructive discussions, citizens can contribute to a more inclusive and accountable political system.